tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3428288523943634178.post775306784180759106..comments2011-08-29T12:11:02.380-06:00Comments on The Nog: Recalled SVN-35 Not Doing WellUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3428288523943634178.post-85935542880934087252011-08-29T12:11:02.380-06:002011-08-29T12:11:02.380-06:00HIPAR,
I can't answer why they set it usable, ...HIPAR,<br />I can't answer why they set it usable, but I'll bet it was acting better before they did. Now it's acting up again. If your receiver does select it instead of SVN62, you will have worse performance, no doubt about it.Ted Driverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10976906985153174254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3428288523943634178.post-89625552525893662202011-08-29T10:42:27.991-06:002011-08-29T10:42:27.991-06:00My satellite tracking program shows relative motio...My satellite tracking program shows relative motion for SV35 is slow westward drift. It currently cannot improve DOP because it's orbiting so close to SV62, a new IIF satellite with a signal in space error (SIS) of 0.5 meters.<br /><br />So why has the USAF set SVN35, with its poor SIS, usable? Will its unpredictable SIS error actually increase positioning error if my receiver selects SVN35 rather than SVN62?HIPARhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07522666895119744137noreply@blogger.com